Denise and her blog
Expectancy is Worldwide!
Did you know that Expectancy is unique, worldwide, in providing university-level professional and academic courses specifically for midwives on the safe use of complementary therapies in pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period? Expectancy has been offering complementary therapy courses for almost 22 years, in the UK and overseas. I’ve helped NHS midwives to implement aromatherapy, clinical reflexology and moxibustion for breech presentation. I’ve encouraged several hundred midwives to train in both complementary therapies and business studies so they can start their own private practices. And I’ve had the great pleasure of travelling to many countries around the world, including Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, China, Iceland, Spain, Norway, Canada and elsewhere, to train midwives in various therapies. I’m immensely proud of the midwives who join our Expectancy Community and who follow their dreams of providing the best possible care to their clients.
A Place For Complementary Therapies
One of the most important principles behind everything I teach at Expectancy is safety and professional accountability.
Complementary therapies in midwifery can sometimes attract scepticism, particularly when they are associated with discussions around physiological or “natural” birth.
That’s why our programmes place such a strong emphasis on evidence-based practice, safety frameworks and professional debate.
Midwives need to be able to explain why they are using a therapy, understand the safety considerations, and practise within the professional boundaries set out in the Nursing and Midwifery Council Code.
This allows midwives to confidently discuss their practice with colleagues, managers and parents - grounded in professional accountability and the best evidence available.
Complementary therapies should never sit outside professional practice.
They should sit within it.
What About Midwives Who Choose To Work Outside Mainstream Midwifery?
I had a great time recently at the Royal College of Midwives’ education and research conference in London. It was good to meet up with friends and colleagues and to debate current issues around midwifery and maternity care. As you might expect, there was a lot of discussion about the ongoing investigations into maternity service problems, and of course, everyone had their views on possible solutions. There were several presentations on equity, diversity and inclusivity and several on the increasing use of artificial intelligence in midwifery education. There was also much talk of the difficulties facing students trying to achieve their required 40 physiological births and, of course, the ongoing problem of intervention in childbirth.
However, it was disappointing to see that the RCM and all the speakers focused only on NHS clinical midwifery or research and on education provided by universities. There was no acknowledgement at all of the growing number of registered midwives choosing to work outside “the system” – independent midwives offering full birth services, midwifery educators providing specialist post-registration training, midwives in private practice offering antenatal education, complementary therapies, tongue tie division and other maternity-related services, midwives working for charities such as BPAS, or for companies that design digital programmes for maternity care or midwives engaged by private companies to undertake research or very senior midwives with national and international reputations offering consultancy services.
This lack of recognition that midwives can work in many ways in diverse settings is disrespectful to those of us who are self-employed. There is no apparent appreciation that being a registered midwife entitles you to work anywhere in any setting in any field of midwifery as defined by the WHO and ICM, from preconception care and fertility through pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period up to one year after birth. It is as if those who work outside mainstream clinical or educational organisations are “persona non grata” and disregarded in favour of the majority. Is this not a form of discrimination in its own right?
I raised this point on at least two occasions during the conference, including in sessions at which there were several midwifery educators or clinicians who have retired from the university sector or NHS and who are now working in a freelance consultancy capacity. There is an inherent undercurrent of dismissal of those who leave the NHS or higher education systems (even when some of those have given years of service and reached retirement age but who choose to continue working). It is almost as if our treacherous behaviour somehow undermines the value of the NHS or HEIs and that by doing so, we come up lacking credibility. (I remember, over twenty years ago when I left the university to set up Expectancy, a colleague from another university implying that I could not possibly be as good a lecturer as before now I had dared to go it alone.)
Then of course, there is the small matter of freelance midwives actually charging for our services. Chatting with colleagues about the various investigations currently in the news, one fairly senior midwife commented on the apparent hefty fees one authority was “raking in” – it was not actually a large amount that was quoted - but to an NHS midwife on a salary it obviously seemed like a small fortune. Yet, do NHS midwives work for nothing? Do they offer their services pro bono? Absolutely not – even though they may work plenty of hours of unpaid overtime. It seems, however, that actually having to charge for your services (rather than being paid a salary) is not de rigeur, not in keeping with the philosophy of our free-at-the-point-of-access healthcare system.
Whilst I completely understand that there are other priorities at present, including Ockenden reviews, the Amos report, ever-increasing intervention rates in childbirth, lack of resources, including staff and a dwindling (retiring) workforce, no jobs for newly qualified midwives and more, it is imperative that our colleagues and the organisations that affect our profession recognises that the way midwives choose to work is changing – and the way expectant parents want to receive care is also changing and they are prepared to pay for services they cannot find in the NHS. Let’s have a shout out for all those wonderful midwives who are working incredibly hard outside the system – in clinical midwifery, in education and in other areas in which being a registered midwife is a requirement.
Previous articles
Expectancy is Worldwide!
A Place For Complementary Therapies
What About Midwives Who Choose To Work Outside Mainstream Midwifery?
Working with The Midwives at Liverpool Woman's NHS Foundation Trust
How Things Have Changed In Midwifery
Would you ever think to ask about pets when discussing essential oils? 🐾
Praise for Liverpool Women’s Hospital’s Pre-Birth and Postdates Pregnancy Service
FAQs
Safety and Storage of Essential Oils
Complementary Therapies Aren’t About “doing more ”
